13.6. StabilityCondition: Seminorm
13.6.1. slicingDist_self
The Bridgeland generalized metric is zero on the diagonal: d(\mathcal{P}, \mathcal{P}) = 0.
Proof: Each phase difference is |\phi^\pm(E) - \phi^\pm(E)| = 0, so the supremum is 0.
CategoryTheory.Triangulated.slicingDist_self.{v, u} (C : Type u) [CategoryTheory.Category.{v, u} C] [CategoryTheory.Limits.HasZeroObject C] [CategoryTheory.HasShift C ℤ] [CategoryTheory.Preadditive C] [∀ (n : ℤ), (CategoryTheory.shiftFunctor C n).Additive] [CategoryTheory.Pretriangulated C] (s : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.Slicing C) : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.slicingDist C s s = 0CategoryTheory.Triangulated.slicingDist_self.{v, u} (C : Type u) [CategoryTheory.Category.{v, u} C] [CategoryTheory.Limits.HasZeroObject C] [CategoryTheory.HasShift C ℤ] [CategoryTheory.Preadditive C] [∀ (n : ℤ), (CategoryTheory.shiftFunctor C n).Additive] [CategoryTheory.Pretriangulated C] (s : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.Slicing C) : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.slicingDist C s s = 0
Something wrong, better idea? Suggest a change
13.6.2. slicingDist_symm
The Bridgeland generalized metric is symmetric: d(\mathcal{P}_1, \mathcal{P}_2) = d(\mathcal{P}_2, \mathcal{P}_1).
Proof: Follows from |a - b| = |b - a| applied to each phase difference.
CategoryTheory.Triangulated.slicingDist_symm.{v, u} (C : Type u) [CategoryTheory.Category.{v, u} C] [CategoryTheory.Limits.HasZeroObject C] [CategoryTheory.HasShift C ℤ] [CategoryTheory.Preadditive C] [∀ (n : ℤ), (CategoryTheory.shiftFunctor C n).Additive] [CategoryTheory.Pretriangulated C] (s₁ s₂ : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.Slicing C) : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.slicingDist C s₁ s₂ = CategoryTheory.Triangulated.slicingDist C s₂ s₁CategoryTheory.Triangulated.slicingDist_symm.{v, u} (C : Type u) [CategoryTheory.Category.{v, u} C] [CategoryTheory.Limits.HasZeroObject C] [CategoryTheory.HasShift C ℤ] [CategoryTheory.Preadditive C] [∀ (n : ℤ), (CategoryTheory.shiftFunctor C n).Additive] [CategoryTheory.Pretriangulated C] (s₁ s₂ : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.Slicing C) : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.slicingDist C s₁ s₂ = CategoryTheory.Triangulated.slicingDist C s₂ s₁
Something wrong, better idea? Suggest a change
13.6.3. slicingDist_triangle
The Bridgeland generalized metric satisfies the triangle inequality: d(\mathcal{P}_1, \mathcal{P}_3) \leq d(\mathcal{P}_1, \mathcal{P}_2) + d(\mathcal{P}_2, \mathcal{P}_3).
Proof: For each nonzero E, applies the absolute value triangle inequality |a - c| \leq |a - b| + |b - c| to both \phi^+ and \phi^-, then takes the supremum.
CategoryTheory.Triangulated.slicingDist_triangle.{v, u} (C : Type u) [CategoryTheory.Category.{v, u} C] [CategoryTheory.Limits.HasZeroObject C] [CategoryTheory.HasShift C ℤ] [CategoryTheory.Preadditive C] [∀ (n : ℤ), (CategoryTheory.shiftFunctor C n).Additive] [CategoryTheory.Pretriangulated C] (s₁ s₂ s₃ : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.Slicing C) : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.slicingDist C s₁ s₃ ≤ CategoryTheory.Triangulated.slicingDist C s₁ s₂ + CategoryTheory.Triangulated.slicingDist C s₂ s₃CategoryTheory.Triangulated.slicingDist_triangle.{v, u} (C : Type u) [CategoryTheory.Category.{v, u} C] [CategoryTheory.Limits.HasZeroObject C] [CategoryTheory.HasShift C ℤ] [CategoryTheory.Preadditive C] [∀ (n : ℤ), (CategoryTheory.shiftFunctor C n).Additive] [CategoryTheory.Pretriangulated C] (s₁ s₂ s₃ : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.Slicing C) : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.slicingDist C s₁ s₃ ≤ CategoryTheory.Triangulated.slicingDist C s₁ s₂ + CategoryTheory.Triangulated.slicingDist C s₂ s₃
Something wrong, better idea? Suggest a change
13.6.4. instPseudoEMetricSpaceSlicing
[Lemma 6.1] pseudo-emetric (not generalized metric: missing separation); Lean uses sup of phase differences, paper uses inf of containment radii — equivalence not proved
The space of slicings of \mathcal{C} carries a pseudo-extended-metric structure with distance d(\mathcal{P}, \mathcal{Q}) = \sup_{0 \neq E} \max(|\phi^+_{\mathcal{P}}(E) - \phi^+_{\mathcal{Q}}(E)|, |\phi^-_{\mathcal{P}}(E) - \phi^-_{\mathcal{Q}}(E)|), corresponding to Lemma 6.1 of Bridgeland.
Construction: The edist field is slicingDist; the three axioms (self-distance zero, symmetry, triangle inequality) are supplied by slicingDist_self, slicingDist_symm, and slicingDist_triangle. Note this is a pseudo-emetric (distances may be +\infty and distinct slicings may have distance zero), not a genuine metric.
CategoryTheory.Triangulated.instPseudoEMetricSpaceSlicing.{v, u} (C : Type u) [CategoryTheory.Category.{v, u} C] [CategoryTheory.Limits.HasZeroObject C] [CategoryTheory.HasShift C ℤ] [CategoryTheory.Preadditive C] [∀ (n : ℤ), (CategoryTheory.shiftFunctor C n).Additive] [CategoryTheory.Pretriangulated C] : PseudoEMetricSpace (CategoryTheory.Triangulated.Slicing C)CategoryTheory.Triangulated.instPseudoEMetricSpaceSlicing.{v, u} (C : Type u) [CategoryTheory.Category.{v, u} C] [CategoryTheory.Limits.HasZeroObject C] [CategoryTheory.HasShift C ℤ] [CategoryTheory.Preadditive C] [∀ (n : ℤ), (CategoryTheory.shiftFunctor C n).Additive] [CategoryTheory.Pretriangulated C] : PseudoEMetricSpace (CategoryTheory.Triangulated.Slicing C)
Something wrong, better idea? Suggest a change
13.6.5. phiPlus_sub_lt_of_slicingDist
If d(\mathcal{P}_1, \mathcal{P}_2) < \varepsilon, then |\phi_1^+(E) - \phi_2^+(E)| < \varepsilon for every nonzero E. This is one direction of Lemma 6.1.
Proof: Contrapositive: if |\phi_1^+(E) - \phi_2^+(E)| \geq \varepsilon, then the supremum defining d is at least \varepsilon.
CategoryTheory.Triangulated.phiPlus_sub_lt_of_slicingDist.{v, u} (C : Type u) [CategoryTheory.Category.{v, u} C] [CategoryTheory.Limits.HasZeroObject C] [CategoryTheory.HasShift C ℤ] [CategoryTheory.Preadditive C] [∀ (n : ℤ), (CategoryTheory.shiftFunctor C n).Additive] [CategoryTheory.Pretriangulated C] (s₁ s₂ : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.Slicing C) {E : C} (hE : ¬CategoryTheory.Limits.IsZero E) {ε : ℝ} (hd : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.slicingDist C s₁ s₂ < ENNReal.ofReal ε) : |CategoryTheory.Triangulated.Slicing.phiPlus C s₁ E hE - CategoryTheory.Triangulated.Slicing.phiPlus C s₂ E hE| < εCategoryTheory.Triangulated.phiPlus_sub_lt_of_slicingDist.{v, u} (C : Type u) [CategoryTheory.Category.{v, u} C] [CategoryTheory.Limits.HasZeroObject C] [CategoryTheory.HasShift C ℤ] [CategoryTheory.Preadditive C] [∀ (n : ℤ), (CategoryTheory.shiftFunctor C n).Additive] [CategoryTheory.Pretriangulated C] (s₁ s₂ : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.Slicing C) {E : C} (hE : ¬CategoryTheory.Limits.IsZero E) {ε : ℝ} (hd : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.slicingDist C s₁ s₂ < ENNReal.ofReal ε) : |CategoryTheory.Triangulated.Slicing.phiPlus C s₁ E hE - CategoryTheory.Triangulated.Slicing.phiPlus C s₂ E hE| < ε
Something wrong, better idea? Suggest a change
13.6.6. phiMinus_sub_lt_of_slicingDist
If d(\mathcal{P}_1, \mathcal{P}_2) < \varepsilon, then |\phi_1^-(E) - \phi_2^-(E)| < \varepsilon for every nonzero E. This is the \phi^- direction of Lemma 6.1.
Proof: Identical to phiPlus_sub_lt_of_slicingDist using the \phi^- component of the maximum.
CategoryTheory.Triangulated.phiMinus_sub_lt_of_slicingDist.{v, u} (C : Type u) [CategoryTheory.Category.{v, u} C] [CategoryTheory.Limits.HasZeroObject C] [CategoryTheory.HasShift C ℤ] [CategoryTheory.Preadditive C] [∀ (n : ℤ), (CategoryTheory.shiftFunctor C n).Additive] [CategoryTheory.Pretriangulated C] (s₁ s₂ : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.Slicing C) {E : C} (hE : ¬CategoryTheory.Limits.IsZero E) {ε : ℝ} (hd : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.slicingDist C s₁ s₂ < ENNReal.ofReal ε) : |CategoryTheory.Triangulated.Slicing.phiMinus C s₁ E hE - CategoryTheory.Triangulated.Slicing.phiMinus C s₂ E hE| < εCategoryTheory.Triangulated.phiMinus_sub_lt_of_slicingDist.{v, u} (C : Type u) [CategoryTheory.Category.{v, u} C] [CategoryTheory.Limits.HasZeroObject C] [CategoryTheory.HasShift C ℤ] [CategoryTheory.Preadditive C] [∀ (n : ℤ), (CategoryTheory.shiftFunctor C n).Additive] [CategoryTheory.Pretriangulated C] (s₁ s₂ : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.Slicing C) {E : C} (hE : ¬CategoryTheory.Limits.IsZero E) {ε : ℝ} (hd : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.slicingDist C s₁ s₂ < ENNReal.ofReal ε) : |CategoryTheory.Triangulated.Slicing.phiMinus C s₁ E hE - CategoryTheory.Triangulated.Slicing.phiMinus C s₂ E hE| < ε
Something wrong, better idea? Suggest a change
13.6.7. intervalProp_of_semistable_slicingDist
Lemma 6.1 (one direction). If d(\mathcal{P}_1, \mathcal{P}_2) < \varepsilon and E is \mathcal{P}_2-semistable of phase \phi, then \phi_1^+(E), \phi_1^-(E) \in (\phi - \varepsilon, \phi + \varepsilon). In words: the HN phases of a semistable object with respect to one slicing are controlled by the slicing distance.
Proof: Uses phiPlus_eq_phiMinus_of_semistable to replace both \phi_2^\pm(E) by \phi, then applies the phase difference bounds.
CategoryTheory.Triangulated.intervalProp_of_semistable_slicingDist.{v, u} (C : Type u) [CategoryTheory.Category.{v, u} C] [CategoryTheory.Limits.HasZeroObject C] [CategoryTheory.HasShift C ℤ] [CategoryTheory.Preadditive C] [∀ (n : ℤ), (CategoryTheory.shiftFunctor C n).Additive] [CategoryTheory.Pretriangulated C] (s₁ s₂ : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.Slicing C) {E : C} {φ : ℝ} (hE : ¬CategoryTheory.Limits.IsZero E) (hS : s₂.P φ E) {ε : ℝ} (hd : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.slicingDist C s₁ s₂ < ENNReal.ofReal ε) : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.Slicing.phiPlus C s₁ E hE ∈ Set.Ioo (φ - ε) (φ + ε) ∧ CategoryTheory.Triangulated.Slicing.phiMinus C s₁ E hE ∈ Set.Ioo (φ - ε) (φ + ε)CategoryTheory.Triangulated.intervalProp_of_semistable_slicingDist.{v, u} (C : Type u) [CategoryTheory.Category.{v, u} C] [CategoryTheory.Limits.HasZeroObject C] [CategoryTheory.HasShift C ℤ] [CategoryTheory.Preadditive C] [∀ (n : ℤ), (CategoryTheory.shiftFunctor C n).Additive] [CategoryTheory.Pretriangulated C] (s₁ s₂ : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.Slicing C) {E : C} {φ : ℝ} (hE : ¬CategoryTheory.Limits.IsZero E) (hS : s₂.P φ E) {ε : ℝ} (hd : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.slicingDist C s₁ s₂ < ENNReal.ofReal ε) : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.Slicing.phiPlus C s₁ E hE ∈ Set.Ioo (φ - ε) (φ + ε) ∧ CategoryTheory.Triangulated.Slicing.phiMinus C s₁ E hE ∈ Set.Ioo (φ - ε) (φ + ε)
Something wrong, better idea? Suggest a change
13.6.8. slicingDist_le_of_phase_bounds
Converse direction: if |\phi_1^+(E) - \phi_2^+(E)| \leq \varepsilon and |\phi_1^-(E) - \phi_2^-(E)| \leq \varepsilon for all nonzero E, then d(\mathcal{P}_1, \mathcal{P}_2) \leq \varepsilon.
Proof: Takes the supremum of the pointwise bounds.
CategoryTheory.Triangulated.slicingDist_le_of_phase_bounds.{v, u} (C : Type u) [CategoryTheory.Category.{v, u} C] [CategoryTheory.Limits.HasZeroObject C] [CategoryTheory.HasShift C ℤ] [CategoryTheory.Preadditive C] [∀ (n : ℤ), (CategoryTheory.shiftFunctor C n).Additive] [CategoryTheory.Pretriangulated C] (s₁ s₂ : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.Slicing C) {ε : ℝ} (hP : ∀ (E : C) (hE : ¬CategoryTheory.Limits.IsZero E), |CategoryTheory.Triangulated.Slicing.phiPlus C s₁ E hE - CategoryTheory.Triangulated.Slicing.phiPlus C s₂ E hE| ≤ ε) (hM : ∀ (E : C) (hE : ¬CategoryTheory.Limits.IsZero E), |CategoryTheory.Triangulated.Slicing.phiMinus C s₁ E hE - CategoryTheory.Triangulated.Slicing.phiMinus C s₂ E hE| ≤ ε) : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.slicingDist C s₁ s₂ ≤ ENNReal.ofReal εCategoryTheory.Triangulated.slicingDist_le_of_phase_bounds.{v, u} (C : Type u) [CategoryTheory.Category.{v, u} C] [CategoryTheory.Limits.HasZeroObject C] [CategoryTheory.HasShift C ℤ] [CategoryTheory.Preadditive C] [∀ (n : ℤ), (CategoryTheory.shiftFunctor C n).Additive] [CategoryTheory.Pretriangulated C] (s₁ s₂ : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.Slicing C) {ε : ℝ} (hP : ∀ (E : C) (hE : ¬CategoryTheory.Limits.IsZero E), |CategoryTheory.Triangulated.Slicing.phiPlus C s₁ E hE - CategoryTheory.Triangulated.Slicing.phiPlus C s₂ E hE| ≤ ε) (hM : ∀ (E : C) (hE : ¬CategoryTheory.Limits.IsZero E), |CategoryTheory.Triangulated.Slicing.phiMinus C s₁ E hE - CategoryTheory.Triangulated.Slicing.phiMinus C s₂ E hE| ≤ ε) : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.slicingDist C s₁ s₂ ≤ ENNReal.ofReal ε
Something wrong, better idea? Suggest a change
13.6.9. stabSeminorm_nonneg
The Bridgeland seminorm is nonnegative: \|U\|_\sigma \geq 0. Trivially true since \|U\|_\sigma \in \mathbb{R}_{\geq 0}^\infty.
Proof: Immediate from the definition of \mathbb{R}_{\geq 0}^\infty.
CategoryTheory.Triangulated.stabSeminorm_nonneg.{v, u, u'} (C : Type u) [CategoryTheory.Category.{v, u} C] [CategoryTheory.Limits.HasZeroObject C] [CategoryTheory.HasShift C ℤ] [CategoryTheory.Preadditive C] [∀ (n : ℤ), (CategoryTheory.shiftFunctor C n).Additive] [CategoryTheory.Pretriangulated C] {Λ : Type u'} [AddCommGroup Λ] {v : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.K₀ C →+ Λ} [CategoryTheory.IsTriangulated C] (σ : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.StabilityCondition.WithClassMap C v) (U : Λ →+ ℂ) : 0 ≤ CategoryTheory.Triangulated.stabSeminorm C σ UCategoryTheory.Triangulated.stabSeminorm_nonneg.{v, u, u'} (C : Type u) [CategoryTheory.Category.{v, u} C] [CategoryTheory.Limits.HasZeroObject C] [CategoryTheory.HasShift C ℤ] [CategoryTheory.Preadditive C] [∀ (n : ℤ), (CategoryTheory.shiftFunctor C n).Additive] [CategoryTheory.Pretriangulated C] {Λ : Type u'} [AddCommGroup Λ] {v : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.K₀ C →+ Λ} [CategoryTheory.IsTriangulated C] (σ : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.StabilityCondition.WithClassMap C v) (U : Λ →+ ℂ) : 0 ≤ CategoryTheory.Triangulated.stabSeminorm C σ U
Something wrong, better idea? Suggest a change
13.6.10. stabSeminorm_zero
The seminorm at zero is zero: \|0\|_\sigma = 0.
Proof: Each term in the supremum is \|0\| / \|Z([E])\| = 0.
CategoryTheory.Triangulated.stabSeminorm_zero.{v, u, u'} (C : Type u) [CategoryTheory.Category.{v, u} C] [CategoryTheory.Limits.HasZeroObject C] [CategoryTheory.HasShift C ℤ] [CategoryTheory.Preadditive C] [∀ (n : ℤ), (CategoryTheory.shiftFunctor C n).Additive] [CategoryTheory.Pretriangulated C] {Λ : Type u'} [AddCommGroup Λ] {v : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.K₀ C →+ Λ} [CategoryTheory.IsTriangulated C] (σ : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.StabilityCondition.WithClassMap C v) : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.stabSeminorm C σ 0 = 0CategoryTheory.Triangulated.stabSeminorm_zero.{v, u, u'} (C : Type u) [CategoryTheory.Category.{v, u} C] [CategoryTheory.Limits.HasZeroObject C] [CategoryTheory.HasShift C ℤ] [CategoryTheory.Preadditive C] [∀ (n : ℤ), (CategoryTheory.shiftFunctor C n).Additive] [CategoryTheory.Pretriangulated C] {Λ : Type u'} [AddCommGroup Λ] {v : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.K₀ C →+ Λ} [CategoryTheory.IsTriangulated C] (σ : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.StabilityCondition.WithClassMap C v) : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.stabSeminorm C σ 0 = 0
Something wrong, better idea? Suggest a change
13.6.11. finiteSeminormSubgroup
The finite seminorm subgroup V(\sigma) = \{\, U \in \operatorname{Hom}(\Lambda, \mathbb{C}) : \|U\|_\sigma < \infty \,\}. On a connected component of \operatorname{Stab}(\mathcal{D}), this subgroup is independent of the chosen \sigma (by Lemma 6.2).
Construction: Defined as the AddSubgroup of \Lambda \to \mathbb{C} consisting of those U with finite Bridgeland seminorm. Closure under addition uses the seminorm triangle inequality; closure under negation uses \|-U\|_\sigma = \|U\|_\sigma.
CategoryTheory.Triangulated.finiteSeminormSubgroup.{v, u, u'} (C : Type u) [CategoryTheory.Category.{v, u} C] [CategoryTheory.Limits.HasZeroObject C] [CategoryTheory.HasShift C ℤ] [CategoryTheory.Preadditive C] [∀ (n : ℤ), (CategoryTheory.shiftFunctor C n).Additive] [CategoryTheory.Pretriangulated C] {Λ : Type u'} [AddCommGroup Λ] {v : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.K₀ C →+ Λ} [CategoryTheory.IsTriangulated C] (σ : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.StabilityCondition.WithClassMap C v) : AddSubgroup (Λ →+ ℂ)CategoryTheory.Triangulated.finiteSeminormSubgroup.{v, u, u'} (C : Type u) [CategoryTheory.Category.{v, u} C] [CategoryTheory.Limits.HasZeroObject C] [CategoryTheory.HasShift C ℤ] [CategoryTheory.Preadditive C] [∀ (n : ℤ), (CategoryTheory.shiftFunctor C n).Additive] [CategoryTheory.Pretriangulated C] {Λ : Type u'} [AddCommGroup Λ] {v : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.K₀ C →+ Λ} [CategoryTheory.IsTriangulated C] (σ : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.StabilityCondition.WithClassMap C v) : AddSubgroup (Λ →+ ℂ)
Something wrong, better idea? Suggest a change
13.6.12. sector_bound
Sector bound (Lemma 6.2 core). For a stability condition \sigma = (Z, \mathcal{P}) and U \colon \Lambda \to \mathbb{C}, if \|U([A])\| \leq M \cdot \|Z([A])\| for every semistable factor A, then for any object E with HN phase width at most \eta < 1, \|U([E])\| \leq \frac{M}{\cos(\pi\eta/2)} \cdot \|Z([E])\|. This is the quantitative heart of Bridgeland's seminorm comparison theory.
Proof: Decomposes U([E]) = \sum U([F_i]) and Z([E]) = \sum Z([F_i]) via the HN filtration and K_0 additivity. Bounds \sum \|U([F_i])\| \leq M \sum \|Z([F_i])\| pointwise, then applies the sector estimate \cos(\pi\eta/2) \cdot \sum \|Z([F_i])\| \leq \|Z([E])\|.
CategoryTheory.Triangulated.sector_bound.{v, u, u'} (C : Type u) [CategoryTheory.Category.{v, u} C] [CategoryTheory.Limits.HasZeroObject C] [CategoryTheory.HasShift C ℤ] [CategoryTheory.Preadditive C] [∀ (n : ℤ), (CategoryTheory.shiftFunctor C n).Additive] [CategoryTheory.Pretriangulated C] {Λ : Type u'} [AddCommGroup Λ] {v : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.K₀ C →+ Λ} [CategoryTheory.IsTriangulated C] (σ : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.StabilityCondition.WithClassMap C v) (U : Λ →+ ℂ) {E : C} (F : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.HNFiltration C σ.slicing.P E) (hn : 0 < F.n) {η : ℝ} (hη : 0 ≤ η) (hη1 : η < 1) (hwidth : F.φ ⟨0, hn⟩ - F.φ ⟨F.n - 1, ⋯⟩ ≤ η) {M : ℝ} (hM0 : 0 ≤ M) (hM : ∀ (A : C) (φ : ℝ), σ.slicing.P φ A → ¬CategoryTheory.Limits.IsZero A → ‖U (CategoryTheory.Triangulated.cl C v A)‖ ≤ M * ‖σ.charge A‖) : ‖U (CategoryTheory.Triangulated.cl C v E)‖ ≤ M / Real.cos (Real.pi * η / 2) * ‖σ.charge E‖CategoryTheory.Triangulated.sector_bound.{v, u, u'} (C : Type u) [CategoryTheory.Category.{v, u} C] [CategoryTheory.Limits.HasZeroObject C] [CategoryTheory.HasShift C ℤ] [CategoryTheory.Preadditive C] [∀ (n : ℤ), (CategoryTheory.shiftFunctor C n).Additive] [CategoryTheory.Pretriangulated C] {Λ : Type u'} [AddCommGroup Λ] {v : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.K₀ C →+ Λ} [CategoryTheory.IsTriangulated C] (σ : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.StabilityCondition.WithClassMap C v) (U : Λ →+ ℂ) {E : C} (F : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.HNFiltration C σ.slicing.P E) (hn : 0 < F.n) {η : ℝ} (hη : 0 ≤ η) (hη1 : η < 1) (hwidth : F.φ ⟨0, hn⟩ - F.φ ⟨F.n - 1, ⋯⟩ ≤ η) {M : ℝ} (hM0 : 0 ≤ M) (hM : ∀ (A : C) (φ : ℝ), σ.slicing.P φ A → ¬CategoryTheory.Limits.IsZero A → ‖U (CategoryTheory.Triangulated.cl C v A)‖ ≤ M * ‖σ.charge A‖) : ‖U (CategoryTheory.Triangulated.cl C v E)‖ ≤ M / Real.cos (Real.pi * η / 2) * ‖σ.charge E‖
Something wrong, better idea? Suggest a change
13.6.13. sector_bound'
Variant of the sector bound using the intrinsic phase width \phi^+(E) - \phi^-(E) \leq \eta.
Proof: Reduces to sector_bound by extracting the canonical HN filtration and its intrinsic width.
CategoryTheory.Triangulated.sector_bound'.{v, u, u'} (C : Type u) [CategoryTheory.Category.{v, u} C] [CategoryTheory.Limits.HasZeroObject C] [CategoryTheory.HasShift C ℤ] [CategoryTheory.Preadditive C] [∀ (n : ℤ), (CategoryTheory.shiftFunctor C n).Additive] [CategoryTheory.Pretriangulated C] {Λ : Type u'} [AddCommGroup Λ] {v : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.K₀ C →+ Λ} [CategoryTheory.IsTriangulated C] (σ : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.StabilityCondition.WithClassMap C v) (U : Λ →+ ℂ) {E : C} (hE : ¬CategoryTheory.Limits.IsZero E) {η : ℝ} (hη : 0 ≤ η) (hη1 : η < 1) (hwidth : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.Slicing.phiPlus C σ.slicing E hE - CategoryTheory.Triangulated.Slicing.phiMinus C σ.slicing E hE ≤ η) {M : ℝ} (hM0 : 0 ≤ M) (hM : ∀ (A : C) (φ : ℝ), σ.slicing.P φ A → ¬CategoryTheory.Limits.IsZero A → ‖U (CategoryTheory.Triangulated.cl C v A)‖ ≤ M * ‖σ.charge A‖) : ‖U (CategoryTheory.Triangulated.cl C v E)‖ ≤ M / Real.cos (Real.pi * η / 2) * ‖σ.charge E‖CategoryTheory.Triangulated.sector_bound'.{v, u, u'} (C : Type u) [CategoryTheory.Category.{v, u} C] [CategoryTheory.Limits.HasZeroObject C] [CategoryTheory.HasShift C ℤ] [CategoryTheory.Preadditive C] [∀ (n : ℤ), (CategoryTheory.shiftFunctor C n).Additive] [CategoryTheory.Pretriangulated C] {Λ : Type u'} [AddCommGroup Λ] {v : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.K₀ C →+ Λ} [CategoryTheory.IsTriangulated C] (σ : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.StabilityCondition.WithClassMap C v) (U : Λ →+ ℂ) {E : C} (hE : ¬CategoryTheory.Limits.IsZero E) {η : ℝ} (hη : 0 ≤ η) (hη1 : η < 1) (hwidth : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.Slicing.phiPlus C σ.slicing E hE - CategoryTheory.Triangulated.Slicing.phiMinus C σ.slicing E hE ≤ η) {M : ℝ} (hM0 : 0 ≤ M) (hM : ∀ (A : C) (φ : ℝ), σ.slicing.P φ A → ¬CategoryTheory.Limits.IsZero A → ‖U (CategoryTheory.Triangulated.cl C v A)‖ ≤ M * ‖σ.charge A‖) : ‖U (CategoryTheory.Triangulated.cl C v E)‖ ≤ M / Real.cos (Real.pi * η / 2) * ‖σ.charge E‖
Something wrong, better idea? Suggest a change
13.6.14. norm_Z_le_of_tau_semistable
For a \tau-semistable nonzero object E with d(\sigma, \tau) < \varepsilon < 1/2 and \|\tau.Z - \sigma.Z\|_\sigma \leq M, one has (1 - M/\cos(\pi\varepsilon)) \cdot \|\sigma.Z([E])\| \leq \|\tau.Z([E])\|. This controls \|Z([E])\| by \|W([E])\| via the reverse triangle inequality and the sector bound.
Proof: The \sigma-HN width of E is less than 2\varepsilon (from semistability and the metric bound). Applies the sector bound with \eta = 2\varepsilon and U = \tau.Z - \sigma.Z, then uses the reverse triangle inequality.
CategoryTheory.Triangulated.norm_Z_le_of_tau_semistable.{v, u, u'} (C : Type u) [CategoryTheory.Category.{v, u} C] [CategoryTheory.Limits.HasZeroObject C] [CategoryTheory.HasShift C ℤ] [CategoryTheory.Preadditive C] [∀ (n : ℤ), (CategoryTheory.shiftFunctor C n).Additive] [CategoryTheory.Pretriangulated C] {Λ : Type u'} [AddCommGroup Λ] {v : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.K₀ C →+ Λ} [CategoryTheory.IsTriangulated C] (σ τ : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.StabilityCondition.WithClassMap C v) {E : C} {φ : ℝ} (hE : ¬CategoryTheory.Limits.IsZero E) (hS : τ.slicing.P φ E) {ε : ℝ} (hε : 0 < ε) (hε1 : ε < 1 / 2) (hd : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.slicingDist C σ.slicing τ.slicing < ENNReal.ofReal ε) {M : ℝ} (hM0 : 0 ≤ M) (hM_bound : ∀ (A : C) (ψ : ℝ), σ.slicing.P ψ A → ¬CategoryTheory.Limits.IsZero A → ‖(τ.Z - σ.Z) (CategoryTheory.Triangulated.cl C v A)‖ ≤ M * ‖σ.charge A‖) : (1 - M / Real.cos (Real.pi * ε)) * ‖σ.charge E‖ ≤ ‖τ.charge E‖CategoryTheory.Triangulated.norm_Z_le_of_tau_semistable.{v, u, u'} (C : Type u) [CategoryTheory.Category.{v, u} C] [CategoryTheory.Limits.HasZeroObject C] [CategoryTheory.HasShift C ℤ] [CategoryTheory.Preadditive C] [∀ (n : ℤ), (CategoryTheory.shiftFunctor C n).Additive] [CategoryTheory.Pretriangulated C] {Λ : Type u'} [AddCommGroup Λ] {v : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.K₀ C →+ Λ} [CategoryTheory.IsTriangulated C] (σ τ : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.StabilityCondition.WithClassMap C v) {E : C} {φ : ℝ} (hE : ¬CategoryTheory.Limits.IsZero E) (hS : τ.slicing.P φ E) {ε : ℝ} (hε : 0 < ε) (hε1 : ε < 1 / 2) (hd : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.slicingDist C σ.slicing τ.slicing < ENNReal.ofReal ε) {M : ℝ} (hM0 : 0 ≤ M) (hM_bound : ∀ (A : C) (ψ : ℝ), σ.slicing.P ψ A → ¬CategoryTheory.Limits.IsZero A → ‖(τ.Z - σ.Z) (CategoryTheory.Triangulated.cl C v A)‖ ≤ M * ‖σ.charge A‖) : (1 - M / Real.cos (Real.pi * ε)) * ‖σ.charge E‖ ≤ ‖τ.charge E‖
Something wrong, better idea? Suggest a change
13.6.15. stabSeminorm_bound_real
For \sigma-semistable nonzero A of phase \psi, the ratio \|U([A])\| / \|Z([A])\| is bounded by the toReal of the Bridgeland seminorm \|U\|_\sigma.
Proof: The ratio is one term in the supremum defining \|U\|_\sigma, so it is at most the supremum. Converts via ENNReal.toReal_mono and clears the division.
CategoryTheory.Triangulated.stabSeminorm_bound_real.{v, u, u'} (C : Type u) [CategoryTheory.Category.{v, u} C] [CategoryTheory.Limits.HasZeroObject C] [CategoryTheory.HasShift C ℤ] [CategoryTheory.Preadditive C] [∀ (n : ℤ), (CategoryTheory.shiftFunctor C n).Additive] [CategoryTheory.Pretriangulated C] {Λ : Type u'} [AddCommGroup Λ] {v : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.K₀ C →+ Λ} [CategoryTheory.IsTriangulated C] (σ : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.StabilityCondition.WithClassMap C v) (U : Λ →+ ℂ) (hfin : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.stabSeminorm C σ U ≠ ⊤) {A : C} {ψ : ℝ} (hP : σ.slicing.P ψ A) (hA : ¬CategoryTheory.Limits.IsZero A) : ‖U (CategoryTheory.Triangulated.cl C v A)‖ ≤ (CategoryTheory.Triangulated.stabSeminorm C σ U).toReal * ‖σ.charge A‖CategoryTheory.Triangulated.stabSeminorm_bound_real.{v, u, u'} (C : Type u) [CategoryTheory.Category.{v, u} C] [CategoryTheory.Limits.HasZeroObject C] [CategoryTheory.HasShift C ℤ] [CategoryTheory.Preadditive C] [∀ (n : ℤ), (CategoryTheory.shiftFunctor C n).Additive] [CategoryTheory.Pretriangulated C] {Λ : Type u'} [AddCommGroup Λ] {v : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.K₀ C →+ Λ} [CategoryTheory.IsTriangulated C] (σ : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.StabilityCondition.WithClassMap C v) (U : Λ →+ ℂ) (hfin : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.stabSeminorm C σ U ≠ ⊤) {A : C} {ψ : ℝ} (hP : σ.slicing.P ψ A) (hA : ¬CategoryTheory.Limits.IsZero A) : ‖U (CategoryTheory.Triangulated.cl C v A)‖ ≤ (CategoryTheory.Triangulated.stabSeminorm C σ U).toReal * ‖σ.charge A‖
Something wrong, better idea? Suggest a change
13.6.16. stabSeminorm_lt_top_of_same_Z
Seminorm comparison for same central charge. If \sigma and \tau share the same Z and d(\mathcal{P}, \mathcal{Q}) < \varepsilon < 1/2, then \|U\|_\tau < \infty whenever \|U\|_\sigma < \infty. This shows V(\sigma) \subseteq V(\tau) for nearby conditions with the same charge.
Proof: Bounds each term in \|U\|_\tau using the sector bound: the \sigma-HN width of each \tau-semistable object is at most 2\varepsilon, so \|U([E])\| / \|\tau.Z([E])\| \leq M / \cos(\pi\varepsilon).
CategoryTheory.Triangulated.stabSeminorm_lt_top_of_same_Z.{v, u, u'} (C : Type u) [CategoryTheory.Category.{v, u} C] [CategoryTheory.Limits.HasZeroObject C] [CategoryTheory.HasShift C ℤ] [CategoryTheory.Preadditive C] [∀ (n : ℤ), (CategoryTheory.shiftFunctor C n).Additive] [CategoryTheory.Pretriangulated C] {Λ : Type u'} [AddCommGroup Λ] {v : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.K₀ C →+ Λ} [CategoryTheory.IsTriangulated C] (σ τ : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.StabilityCondition.WithClassMap C v) (hZ : σ.Z = τ.Z) {ε : ℝ} (hε : 0 < ε) (hε1 : ε < 1 / 2) (hd : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.slicingDist C σ.slicing τ.slicing < ENNReal.ofReal ε) (U : Λ →+ ℂ) (hU : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.stabSeminorm C σ U < ⊤) : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.stabSeminorm C τ U < ⊤CategoryTheory.Triangulated.stabSeminorm_lt_top_of_same_Z.{v, u, u'} (C : Type u) [CategoryTheory.Category.{v, u} C] [CategoryTheory.Limits.HasZeroObject C] [CategoryTheory.HasShift C ℤ] [CategoryTheory.Preadditive C] [∀ (n : ℤ), (CategoryTheory.shiftFunctor C n).Additive] [CategoryTheory.Pretriangulated C] {Λ : Type u'} [AddCommGroup Λ] {v : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.K₀ C →+ Λ} [CategoryTheory.IsTriangulated C] (σ τ : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.StabilityCondition.WithClassMap C v) (hZ : σ.Z = τ.Z) {ε : ℝ} (hε : 0 < ε) (hε1 : ε < 1 / 2) (hd : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.slicingDist C σ.slicing τ.slicing < ENNReal.ofReal ε) (U : Λ →+ ℂ) (hU : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.stabSeminorm C σ U < ⊤) : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.stabSeminorm C τ U < ⊤
Something wrong, better idea? Suggest a change
13.6.17. finiteSeminormSubgroup_eq_of_same_Z
Proposition 6.3 (same Z case). If \sigma.Z = \tau.Z and d(\mathcal{P}, \mathcal{Q}) < \varepsilon < 1/2, then V(\sigma) = V(\tau).
Proof: Applies stabSeminorm_lt_top_of_same_Z in both directions (swapping \sigma and \tau and using symmetry of the slicing distance).
CategoryTheory.Triangulated.finiteSeminormSubgroup_eq_of_same_Z.{v, u, u'} (C : Type u) [CategoryTheory.Category.{v, u} C] [CategoryTheory.Limits.HasZeroObject C] [CategoryTheory.HasShift C ℤ] [CategoryTheory.Preadditive C] [∀ (n : ℤ), (CategoryTheory.shiftFunctor C n).Additive] [CategoryTheory.Pretriangulated C] {Λ : Type u'} [AddCommGroup Λ] {v : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.K₀ C →+ Λ} [CategoryTheory.IsTriangulated C] (σ τ : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.StabilityCondition.WithClassMap C v) (hZ : σ.Z = τ.Z) {ε : ℝ} (hε : 0 < ε) (hε1 : ε < 1 / 2) (hd : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.slicingDist C σ.slicing τ.slicing < ENNReal.ofReal ε) : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.finiteSeminormSubgroup C σ = CategoryTheory.Triangulated.finiteSeminormSubgroup C τCategoryTheory.Triangulated.finiteSeminormSubgroup_eq_of_same_Z.{v, u, u'} (C : Type u) [CategoryTheory.Category.{v, u} C] [CategoryTheory.Limits.HasZeroObject C] [CategoryTheory.HasShift C ℤ] [CategoryTheory.Preadditive C] [∀ (n : ℤ), (CategoryTheory.shiftFunctor C n).Additive] [CategoryTheory.Pretriangulated C] {Λ : Type u'} [AddCommGroup Λ] {v : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.K₀ C →+ Λ} [CategoryTheory.IsTriangulated C] (σ τ : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.StabilityCondition.WithClassMap C v) (hZ : σ.Z = τ.Z) {ε : ℝ} (hε : 0 < ε) (hε1 : ε < 1 / 2) (hd : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.slicingDist C σ.slicing τ.slicing < ENNReal.ofReal ε) : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.finiteSeminormSubgroup C σ = CategoryTheory.Triangulated.finiteSeminormSubgroup C τ
Something wrong, better idea? Suggest a change
13.6.18. stabSeminorm_le_of_near
General Lemma 6.2 (explicit seminorm bound). If d(\mathcal{P}, \mathcal{Q}) < \varepsilon < 1/2 and \|\tau.Z - \sigma.Z\|_\sigma < \cos(\pi\varepsilon), then \|U\|_\tau \leq \frac{\|U\|_\sigma}{\cos(\pi\varepsilon) - \|\tau.Z - \sigma.Z\|_\sigma}.
Proof: Uses the sector bound on each \tau-semistable object (HN width < 2\varepsilon) with the pointwise seminorm bound and the reverse triangle inequality estimate on \|Z([E])\|.
CategoryTheory.Triangulated.stabSeminorm_le_of_near.{v, u, u'} (C : Type u) [CategoryTheory.Category.{v, u} C] [CategoryTheory.Limits.HasZeroObject C] [CategoryTheory.HasShift C ℤ] [CategoryTheory.Preadditive C] [∀ (n : ℤ), (CategoryTheory.shiftFunctor C n).Additive] [CategoryTheory.Pretriangulated C] {Λ : Type u'} [AddCommGroup Λ] {v : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.K₀ C →+ Λ} [CategoryTheory.IsTriangulated C] (σ τ : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.StabilityCondition.WithClassMap C v) {ε : ℝ} (hε : 0 < ε) (hε1 : ε < 1 / 2) (hd : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.slicingDist C σ.slicing τ.slicing < ENNReal.ofReal ε) (hZdiff : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.stabSeminorm C σ (τ.Z - σ.Z) < ENNReal.ofReal (Real.cos (Real.pi * ε))) (U : Λ →+ ℂ) (hU : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.stabSeminorm C σ U ≠ ⊤) : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.stabSeminorm C τ U ≤ ENNReal.ofReal ((CategoryTheory.Triangulated.stabSeminorm C σ U).toReal / (Real.cos (Real.pi * ε) - (CategoryTheory.Triangulated.stabSeminorm C σ (τ.Z - σ.Z)).toReal))CategoryTheory.Triangulated.stabSeminorm_le_of_near.{v, u, u'} (C : Type u) [CategoryTheory.Category.{v, u} C] [CategoryTheory.Limits.HasZeroObject C] [CategoryTheory.HasShift C ℤ] [CategoryTheory.Preadditive C] [∀ (n : ℤ), (CategoryTheory.shiftFunctor C n).Additive] [CategoryTheory.Pretriangulated C] {Λ : Type u'} [AddCommGroup Λ] {v : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.K₀ C →+ Λ} [CategoryTheory.IsTriangulated C] (σ τ : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.StabilityCondition.WithClassMap C v) {ε : ℝ} (hε : 0 < ε) (hε1 : ε < 1 / 2) (hd : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.slicingDist C σ.slicing τ.slicing < ENNReal.ofReal ε) (hZdiff : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.stabSeminorm C σ (τ.Z - σ.Z) < ENNReal.ofReal (Real.cos (Real.pi * ε))) (U : Λ →+ ℂ) (hU : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.stabSeminorm C σ U ≠ ⊤) : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.stabSeminorm C τ U ≤ ENNReal.ofReal ((CategoryTheory.Triangulated.stabSeminorm C σ U).toReal / (Real.cos (Real.pi * ε) - (CategoryTheory.Triangulated.stabSeminorm C σ (τ.Z - σ.Z)).toReal))
Something wrong, better idea? Suggest a change
13.6.19. stabSeminorm_lt_top_of_near
General Lemma 6.2 (seminorm finiteness comparison). Under the hypotheses of stabSeminorm_le_of_near, \|U\|_\sigma < \infty implies \|U\|_\tau < \infty.
Proof: Immediate from stabSeminorm_le_of_near since the bound is finite.
CategoryTheory.Triangulated.stabSeminorm_lt_top_of_near.{v, u, u'} (C : Type u) [CategoryTheory.Category.{v, u} C] [CategoryTheory.Limits.HasZeroObject C] [CategoryTheory.HasShift C ℤ] [CategoryTheory.Preadditive C] [∀ (n : ℤ), (CategoryTheory.shiftFunctor C n).Additive] [CategoryTheory.Pretriangulated C] {Λ : Type u'} [AddCommGroup Λ] {v : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.K₀ C →+ Λ} [CategoryTheory.IsTriangulated C] (σ τ : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.StabilityCondition.WithClassMap C v) {ε : ℝ} (hε : 0 < ε) (hε1 : ε < 1 / 2) (hd : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.slicingDist C σ.slicing τ.slicing < ENNReal.ofReal ε) (hZdiff : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.stabSeminorm C σ (τ.Z - σ.Z) < ENNReal.ofReal (Real.cos (Real.pi * ε))) (U : Λ →+ ℂ) (hU : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.stabSeminorm C σ U < ⊤) : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.stabSeminorm C τ U < ⊤CategoryTheory.Triangulated.stabSeminorm_lt_top_of_near.{v, u, u'} (C : Type u) [CategoryTheory.Category.{v, u} C] [CategoryTheory.Limits.HasZeroObject C] [CategoryTheory.HasShift C ℤ] [CategoryTheory.Preadditive C] [∀ (n : ℤ), (CategoryTheory.shiftFunctor C n).Additive] [CategoryTheory.Pretriangulated C] {Λ : Type u'} [AddCommGroup Λ] {v : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.K₀ C →+ Λ} [CategoryTheory.IsTriangulated C] (σ τ : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.StabilityCondition.WithClassMap C v) {ε : ℝ} (hε : 0 < ε) (hε1 : ε < 1 / 2) (hd : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.slicingDist C σ.slicing τ.slicing < ENNReal.ofReal ε) (hZdiff : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.stabSeminorm C σ (τ.Z - σ.Z) < ENNReal.ofReal (Real.cos (Real.pi * ε))) (U : Λ →+ ℂ) (hU : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.stabSeminorm C σ U < ⊤) : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.stabSeminorm C τ U < ⊤
Something wrong, better idea? Suggest a change
13.6.20. finiteSeminormSubgroup_eq_of_basisNhd
Proposition 6.3 (V equality for nearby stability conditions). If \tau \in B_\varepsilon(\sigma) with \varepsilon < 1/8, then V(\sigma) = V(\tau). The key inequality is \sin(\pi\varepsilon)(1 + \cos(\pi\varepsilon)) < \cos^2(\pi\varepsilon) for \varepsilon < 1/8, which ensures the reverse comparison \|\sigma.Z - \tau.Z\|_\tau < \cos(\pi\varepsilon).
Proof: Forward direction uses stabSeminorm_lt_top_of_near. Reverse direction bounds \|\sigma.Z - \tau.Z\|_\tau via the explicit seminorm comparison, then verifies M_Z / (c - M_Z) < c using the trigonometric inequality \sin(x)(1 + \cos(x)) < \cos^2(x) for x = \pi\varepsilon.
CategoryTheory.Triangulated.finiteSeminormSubgroup_eq_of_basisNhd.{v, u, u'} (C : Type u) [CategoryTheory.Category.{v, u} C] [CategoryTheory.Limits.HasZeroObject C] [CategoryTheory.HasShift C ℤ] [CategoryTheory.Preadditive C] [∀ (n : ℤ), (CategoryTheory.shiftFunctor C n).Additive] [CategoryTheory.Pretriangulated C] {Λ : Type u'} [AddCommGroup Λ] {v : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.K₀ C →+ Λ} [CategoryTheory.IsTriangulated C] (σ τ : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.StabilityCondition.WithClassMap C v) {ε : ℝ} (hε : 0 < ε) (hε1 : ε < 1 / 8) (hd : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.slicingDist C σ.slicing τ.slicing < ENNReal.ofReal ε) (hZnorm : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.stabSeminorm C σ (τ.Z - σ.Z) < ENNReal.ofReal (Real.sin (Real.pi * ε))) : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.finiteSeminormSubgroup C σ = CategoryTheory.Triangulated.finiteSeminormSubgroup C τCategoryTheory.Triangulated.finiteSeminormSubgroup_eq_of_basisNhd.{v, u, u'} (C : Type u) [CategoryTheory.Category.{v, u} C] [CategoryTheory.Limits.HasZeroObject C] [CategoryTheory.HasShift C ℤ] [CategoryTheory.Preadditive C] [∀ (n : ℤ), (CategoryTheory.shiftFunctor C n).Additive] [CategoryTheory.Pretriangulated C] {Λ : Type u'} [AddCommGroup Λ] {v : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.K₀ C →+ Λ} [CategoryTheory.IsTriangulated C] (σ τ : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.StabilityCondition.WithClassMap C v) {ε : ℝ} (hε : 0 < ε) (hε1 : ε < 1 / 8) (hd : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.slicingDist C σ.slicing τ.slicing < ENNReal.ofReal ε) (hZnorm : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.stabSeminorm C σ (τ.Z - σ.Z) < ENNReal.ofReal (Real.sin (Real.pi * ε))) : CategoryTheory.Triangulated.finiteSeminormSubgroup C σ = CategoryTheory.Triangulated.finiteSeminormSubgroup C τ
Something wrong, better idea? Suggest a change