Documentation

BridgelandStability.StabilityCondition.Basic

Bridgeland Stability Conditions — Ext Theorems and Phase Rigidity #

Extensionality theorems for stability conditions, phase rigidity (Lemma 6.4 sublemma), and the exponential decomposition impossibility lemmas. The core structures, topology, and seminorm are in StabilityCondition.Defs.

References #

Ext theorems #

theorem CategoryTheory.Triangulated.preStabilityCondition_compat_apply (C : Type u) [Category.{v, u} C] [Limits.HasZeroObject C] [HasShift C ℤ] [Preadditive C] [∀ (n : ℤ), (shiftFunctor C n).Additive] [Pretriangulated C] {Λ : Type u'} [AddCommGroup Λ] {v : K₀ C →+ Λ} (σ : PreStabilityCondition.WithClassMap C v) (φ : ℝ) (E : C) (hE : σ.slicing.P φ E) (hNZ : ¬Limits.IsZero E) :
∃ (m : ℝ), 0 < m ∧ σ.charge E = ↑m * Complex.exp (↑(Real.pi * φ) * Complex.I)

The ordinary compatibility statement for a prestability condition, with the identity class map simplified away.

Phase rigidity for same central charge #

theorem CategoryTheory.Triangulated.StabilityCondition.WithClassMap.phase_eq_of_same_Z (C : Type u) [Category.{v, u} C] [Limits.HasZeroObject C] [HasShift C ℤ] [Preadditive C] [∀ (n : ℤ), (shiftFunctor C n).Additive] [Pretriangulated C] [IsTriangulated C] {Λ : Type u'} [AddCommGroup Λ] {v : K₀ C →+ Λ} (σ τ : WithClassMap C v) (hZ : σ.Z = τ.Z) {E : C} {φ ψ : ℝ} (hσ : σ.slicing.P φ E) (hτ : τ.slicing.P ψ E) (hE : ¬Limits.IsZero E) (habs : |φ - ψ| < 2) :
φ = ψ

Lemma 6.4 sublemma. If two stability conditions σ and τ have the same central charge Z, and a nonzero object E is σ-semistable of phase φ and τ-semistable of phase ψ with |φ - ψ| < 2, then φ = ψ.

theorem CategoryTheory.Triangulated.no_exp_decomp_below {ψ : ℝ} {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) {m : ℝ} {b : Fin n → ℝ} (hb : ∀ (i : Fin n), 0 < b i) {θ : Fin n → ℝ} (hθ_lt : ∀ (i : Fin n), θ i < ψ) (hθ_gt : ∀ (i : Fin n), ψ - 1 < θ i) (heq : ↑m * Complex.exp (↑(Real.pi * ψ) * Complex.I) = ∑ i : Fin n, ↑(b i) * Complex.exp (↑(Real.pi * θ i) * Complex.I)) :

A real multiple of exp(iπψ) cannot equal a sum of positive real multiples of exp(iπθⱼ) where all θⱼ lie strictly below ψ and above ψ - 1. The proof takes the imaginary part after dividing by exp(iπψ): since sin(π(θⱼ - ψ)) < 0 for all j, the imaginary part of the sum is strictly negative, contradicting the real LHS.

theorem CategoryTheory.Triangulated.no_exp_decomp_above {ψ : ℝ} {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) {m : ℝ} {b : Fin n → ℝ} (hb : ∀ (i : Fin n), 0 < b i) {θ : Fin n → ℝ} (hθ_gt : ∀ (i : Fin n), ψ < θ i) (hθ_lt : ∀ (i : Fin n), θ i < ψ + 1) (heq : ↑m * Complex.exp (↑(Real.pi * ψ) * Complex.I) = ∑ i : Fin n, ↑(b i) * Complex.exp (↑(Real.pi * θ i) * Complex.I)) :

Symmetric version: a real multiple of exp(iπψ) cannot equal a sum of positive real multiples of exp(iπθⱼ) where all θⱼ lie strictly above ψ and below ψ + 1.